US lawmakers have criticized Andrew Mountbatten Windsor for remaining silent during an investigation into his connection with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Calls have been made for the former prince to testify in the US about his enduring friendship with Epstein as part of a broader probe into Epstein’s criminal activities. Pressure has escalated on Andrew, resulting in the revocation of all his royal and military titles.
The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has requested Andrew to participate in a transcribed interview. Despite vehemently denying all accusations against him, Andrew failed to meet the November 20 deadline set by the committee for a response to a letter signed by 16 members of Congress.
Ranking member Robert Garcia and Congressman Suhas Subramanyam from the Democratic Party criticized Andrew for his silence, stating that it speaks volumes. While the committee lacks the authority to compel non-US citizens or foreign nationals outside the US to testify, Andrew was not legally obligated to respond.
In response to Andrew’s silence, lawmakers emphasized the importance of addressing the serious allegations raised by reviewing documents, public records, and Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s testimony. They affirmed their commitment to pursuing justice for the survivors, regardless of the individuals’ wealth, status, or political affiliation.
Andrew has faced heightened scrutiny following the publication of Virginia Giuffre’s memoir, where she accused him of sexual misconduct when she was 17. Shortly before the book’s release, Andrew voluntarily relinquished his Duke of York title. In a further blow, King Charles announced the removal of Andrew’s royal titles and privileges, including his eviction from the Royal Lodge mansion.
Meanwhile, President Donald Trump, who has also faced criticism regarding his association with Epstein, eventually approved the release of the Epstein files after previously impeding the Department of Justice documents’ disclosure. Trump’s decision came after a 427-1 House vote and unanimous Senate endorsement of the measure, reflecting the growing pressure for transparency in the Epstein case.