The Alberta government has eliminated habitat protections for the endangered greater sage grouse by amending the Public Lands Act in July. This move has removed safeguards for the bird in designated protection and recovery zones, allowing for industrial activities within their habitat. The greater sage grouse, classified as endangered by both the Alberta and federal governments, is facing a severe population decline, with fewer than 100 birds remaining in Alberta’s southeastern corner.
A significant 98% population decrease of the greater sage grouse in Alberta occurred between 1968 and 2012, mainly due to habitat loss and industrial development. University of Alberta ecology professor Mark Boyce, involved in sage grouse conservation for decades, expressed concerns that the removal of provincial protections jeopardizes the survival of the remaining population in Alberta.
According to Boyce, the province’s decision prioritizes industrial development over conservation efforts, putting the endangered species at risk of extinction. The provincial government, however, maintains that the changes aim to simplify regulations in sage grouse habitats, providing clarity for proponents operating in southeastern Alberta.
In response to criticisms, Alberta’s Environment and Protected Areas communications director, Andrew Livingstone, emphasized the government’s commitment to a sage grouse recovery program focusing on conservation outcomes while supporting the province’s economy. The province plans to invest in various recovery initiatives, including habitat restoration, predator management, and enhanced monitoring to aid in the species’ recovery.
Despite federal protections covering a portion of Alberta’s greater sage grouse habitat, the removal of provincial safeguards poses a significant threat to the species, as noted by conservation experts. The helium industry, which influenced the removal of habitat protections, has been granted approvals within sage grouse habitats, raising concerns about the long-term impact on the species’ survival.
Industry representatives argue that the previous habitat protections were overly restrictive and hindered economic development. They advocate for a balance between environmental considerations and economic growth, suggesting that lifting these protections is necessary for sustainable development.